0.06/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 1440 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 180 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 08:37:54 EDT 2024 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.46 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nvsRAiAySD/E---3.1_28311.p 0.19/0.50 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSMNHSA. 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.19/0.50 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with pid 28390 completed with status 0 0.19/0.50 # Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSMNHSA. 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.19/0.50 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied 0.19/0.50 # Search class: HGHNS-FFSF32-MHSFFSBN 0.19/0.50 # partial match(2): HGHNS-FFMF32-SHSFFSBN 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.19/0.50 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 109s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 28395 completed with status 0 0.19/0.50 # Result found by ho_unfolding_3 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSMNHSA. 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.19/0.50 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied 0.19/0.50 # Search class: HGHNS-FFSF32-MHSFFSBN 0.19/0.50 # partial match(2): HGHNS-FFMF32-SHSFFSBN 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.19/0.50 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 109s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 0.19/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.19/0.50 0.19/0.50 # Proof found! 0.19/0.50 # SZS status Theorem 0.19/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_sort1, type, qML_mu: $tType). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_sort2, type, qML_i: $tType). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_22, type, scott_G: qML_mu > qML_i > $o). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_25, type, scott_ess_QML_mu: (qML_mu > qML_i > $o) > qML_mu > qML_i > $o). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_26, type, esk1_0: qML_i). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_27, type, epred1_0: qML_i > $o). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_28, type, esk2_0: qML_i). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_34, type, epred3_3: (qML_mu > qML_i > $o) > qML_mu > qML_i > qML_mu > qML_i > $o). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_35, type, esk7_3: (qML_mu > qML_i > $o) > qML_mu > qML_i > qML_i). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_36, type, esk8_3: (qML_mu > qML_i > $o) > qML_mu > qML_i > qML_mu). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_37, type, esk9_1: qML_i > qML_mu). 0.19/0.50 thf(fact_4_ess__def, axiom, ((scott_ess_QML_mu)=(^[X16:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X4:qML_mu, X5:qML_i]:(((X16 @ X4 @ X5)&![X6:qML_mu > qML_i > $o]:(((X6 @ X4 @ X5)=>![X7:qML_i, X8:qML_mu]:(((X6 @ X8 @ X7)<=(X16 @ X8 @ X7))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nvsRAiAySD/E---3.1_28311.p', fact_4_ess__def)). 0.19/0.50 thf(fact_9_T2, axiom, ![X9:qML_i, X17:qML_mu]:(((scott_G @ X17 @ X9)=>(scott_ess_QML_mu @ scott_G @ X17 @ X9))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nvsRAiAySD/E---3.1_28311.p', fact_9_T2)). 0.19/0.50 thf(fact_2_T3, axiom, ![X9:qML_i, X18:qML_i]:(?[X19:qML_mu]:((scott_G @ X19 @ X18))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nvsRAiAySD/E---3.1_28311.p', fact_2_T3)). 0.19/0.50 thf(conj_0, conjecture, ![X1:qML_i, X2:qML_i > $o]:((~((X2 @ X1))|![X3:qML_i]:((X2 @ X3)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nvsRAiAySD/E---3.1_28311.p', conj_0)). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X46:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X47:qML_mu, X48:qML_i]:(((scott_ess_QML_mu @ X46 @ X47 @ X48)<=>((X46 @ X47 @ X48)&![X6:qML_mu > qML_i > $o]:(((X6 @ X47 @ X48)=>![X7:qML_i, X8:qML_mu]:(((X46 @ X8 @ X7)=>(X6 @ X8 @ X7)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_4_ess__def])])])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X74:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X75:qML_mu, X76:qML_i, X77:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X78:qML_i, X79:qML_mu, X80:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X81:qML_mu, X82:qML_i]:(((((X74 @ X75 @ X76)|~(scott_ess_QML_mu @ X74 @ X75 @ X76))&(~(X77 @ X75 @ X76)|(~(X74 @ X79 @ X78)|(X77 @ X79 @ X78))|~(scott_ess_QML_mu @ X74 @ X75 @ X76)))&(((epred3_3 @ X80 @ X81 @ X82 @ X81 @ X82)|~(X80 @ X81 @ X82)|(scott_ess_QML_mu @ X80 @ X81 @ X82))&(((X80 @ (esk8_3 @ X80 @ X81 @ X82) @ (esk7_3 @ X80 @ X81 @ X82))|~(X80 @ X81 @ X82)|(scott_ess_QML_mu @ X80 @ X81 @ X82))&(~(epred3_3 @ X80 @ X81 @ X82 @ (esk8_3 @ X80 @ X81 @ X82) @ (esk7_3 @ X80 @ X81 @ X82))|~(X80 @ X81 @ X82)|(scott_ess_QML_mu @ X80 @ X81 @ X82)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])])])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X86:qML_i, X87:qML_mu]:((~(scott_G @ X87 @ X86)|(scott_ess_QML_mu @ scott_G @ X87 @ X86))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_9_T2])])])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X88:qML_i]:((scott_G @ (esk9_1 @ X88) @ X88)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_2_T3])])])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X6:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X10:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X8:qML_mu, X4:qML_mu, X3:qML_i, X1:qML_i]:(((X6 @ X8 @ X3)|~((X6 @ X4 @ X1))|~((X10 @ X8 @ X3))|~((scott_ess_QML_mu @ X10 @ X4 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X4:qML_mu, X1:qML_i]:(((scott_ess_QML_mu @ scott_G @ X4 @ X1)|~((scott_G @ X4 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1:qML_i]:((scott_G @ (esk9_1 @ X1) @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X1:qML_i, X4:qML_mu, X8:qML_mu, X6:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X3:qML_i]:((((X4)=(X8))|~((scott_ess_QML_mu @ X6 @ X4 @ X1))|~((X6 @ X8 @ X3)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X1:qML_i]:((scott_ess_QML_mu @ scott_G @ (esk9_1 @ X1) @ X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X1:qML_i, X4:qML_mu, X3:qML_i]:((((esk9_1 @ X1)=(X4))|~((scott_G @ X4 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X1:qML_i, X3:qML_i]:(((esk9_1 @ X1)=(esk9_1 @ X3))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_10])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:qML_i, X2:qML_i > $o]:((~((X2 @ X1))|![X3:qML_i]:((X2 @ X3))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X1:qML_i, X4:qML_mu, X8:qML_mu, X6:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X3:qML_i]:((((X1)=(X3))|~((scott_ess_QML_mu @ X6 @ X4 @ X1))|~((X6 @ X8 @ X3)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X1:qML_i, X3:qML_i]:((scott_ess_QML_mu @ scott_G @ (esk9_1 @ X1) @ X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_14])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)&~(epred1_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X1:qML_i, X4:qML_mu, X3:qML_i]:((((X1)=(X3))|~((scott_G @ X4 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X1:qML_i, X3:qML_i]:((scott_G @ (esk9_1 @ X1) @ X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_14])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_22, plain, ![X1:qML_i, X3:qML_i]:(((X1)=(X3))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk1_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22]), c_0_23])]), ['proof']). 0.19/0.50 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.19/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 18 0.19/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.19/0.50 # Initial clauses : 28 0.19/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6 0.19/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 22 0.19/0.50 # Processed clauses : 104 0.19/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.19/0.50 # ...subsumed : 7 0.19/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 96 0.19/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4 0.19/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.19/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 9 0.19/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 4 0.19/0.50 # Generated clauses : 161 0.19/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 106 0.19/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.19/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.19/0.50 # Paramodulations : 95 0.19/0.50 # Factorizations : 0 0.19/0.50 # NegExts : 30 0.19/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 4 0.19/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.19/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 16 0.19/0.50 # ...of those cached : 1 0.19/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 49 0.19/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5 0.19/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1 0.19/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 8 0.19/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 35 0.19/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40 0.19/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 106 0.19/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.19/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 47 0.19/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 188 0.19/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 170 0.19/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8 0.19/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 66 0.19/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.19/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 174 0.19/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 28 0.19/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 104 0.19/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0 0.19/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5744 0.19/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 650 0.19/0.50 0.19/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.50 # User time : 0.013 s 0.19/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s 0.19/0.50 # Total time : 0.015 s 0.19/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1912 pages 0.19/0.50 0.19/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.50 # User time : 0.017 s 0.19/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s 0.19/0.50 # Total time : 0.019 s 0.19/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages 0.19/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting 0.19/0.50 % E exiting 0.19/0.50 EOF